Oppositional Poverty: The Quantitative/Qualitative Divide and other Dichotomies
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Review
- Vol. 39 (2) , 292-308
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1991.tb02982.x
Abstract
Despite increased recognition that the dichotomy between qualitative and quantitative approaches (and related dichotomies) may be less than useful, such divisions remain entrenched in the core social science disciplines. Theoretical and methodological attempts to move out of and beyond dichotomous frames of reference have not yet led to reconstruction of the social science enterprise. Application of Goody's analysis of the impact of literacy on human cognition to this question suggests that the mode (as well as the context) of academic discourse has structured and constrained the way we (can) think about what we do. The paper concludes by briefly reflecting on the potential of triangulation for reconstructing the way we think about methodological and theoretical dichotomies.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantity and Quality in Social ResearchPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- The Logic of Writing and the Organization of SocietyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- Linking DataPublished by SAGE Publications ,1986
- On The Differences Between Spoken and Written LanguageLanguage and Speech, 1982
- Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: "Inquiry from the inside" and "Inquiry from the outside"Academy of Management Review, 1981
- Dichotomy is Contradiction: On ‘Society’ as Constraint and Construction. Remarks on the Doctrine of the ‘Two Sociologies’Sociological Review, 1975
- The State of Theory and the Status of TheorySociology, 1974
- The Two SociologiesBritish Journal of Sociology, 1970
- The Consequences of LiteracyComparative Studies in Society and History, 1963
- Some Methodological Problems of Field StudiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1962