Reference Values and Characteristics of Brain Stem Audiometry in Neonates and Children
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Audiology
- Vol. 10 (3) , 177-186
- https://doi.org/10.3109/01050398109076178
Abstract
ABR (Auditory Brainstem Responses) delivering the acoustic stimulus both through a headphone (PHN) and in free field (FF), have been recorded in 59 “normal” children divided into four age-related groups: (1) 22 children born at a gestational age ranging between the 36th and the 41st week; (2) 12 with ages ranging from 1 to 6 months; (3) 15 with ages ranging from 6 to 12 months; (4) 10 with ages ranging from 12 to 36 months. Peak latency values obtained with FF technique have been corrected by calculating the delay due to the distance between the loudspeaker and the tested ears (2.04 ms). When using this correction, no statistically significant differences were found between latency values of peaks JI and JV recorded using the two techniques. While JI latency values of various groups do not differ significantly, group 2—and especially group 1—JV latency values are statistically different from those of the 3rd and 4th group. This observation was confirmed by JV-JI interval values. JV wave in neonates (group 1), using PHN technique, is detectable at 60 dB p.e. SPL (82%) while in all other groups at 60 dB this wave is clearly detectable in all children (100%). Using FF technique, JV wave is still visible at 60 dB in 78% of the neonates (group 1) and in almost all children of the other groups. Considering ABR waveform, using PHN technique, in the first two groups only three waves are visible and the first one disappears at about 80 dB, while the typical 4–5 waves of normal adult tracings are detectable since 8–12 months of age. FF tracings instead show three peaks in all groups, the first (JI) being less evident when compared with the one obtained using PHN technique. JV amplitude values observed in FF are higher than those obtained delivering the stimulus through the headphone.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Pentobarbital and Ketamine on Brain Stem Auditory Potentials: Latency and Amplitude Intensity Functions After Intraperitoneal AdministrationJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1979
- Binaural Interaction in Brainstem-Evoked ResponsesJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1979
- Brain Stem Evoked Response Audiometry in Newborn Hearing ScreeningJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1979
- Does promethazine (Atosil®) influence the human's early acoustically evoked potentials in the same way as the late potential N1?European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1977
- Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Responses in ChildrenArchives of Otolaryngology (1960), 1977
- The Cross-Check Principle in Pediatric AudiometryJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1976
- Neural responses in the inferior colliculus of albino rat to binaural stimuliThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975
- Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Responses in Human Infants and AdultsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1974
- Neonatal development of auditory system potentials averaged from the scalp of rat and catBrain Research, 1972
- Human Auditory Evoked Potentials: Possible Brain Stem Components Detected on the ScalpScience, 1970