Abstract
Most of today's policy proposals are considered according to whether they are ‘cost‐effective’. It is no longer enough to attempt a retrospective cost‐benefit analysis, although this is also often needed. Given this requirement for cost‐effectiveness, how can one justify expenditure on women's career development? Is it an expensive luxury at the best of times, let alone during the worst recession for fifty years?

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: