SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN TEMPORAL CONTROL OF BEHAVIOR
- 1 November 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 28 (3) , 189-201
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1977.28-189
Abstract
Temporal control of rats' and pigeons' responding was analyzed and compared in detail on fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules with parameters of 30, 60, and 120 seconds. On fixed-time schedules, rats' responding decreased greatly or ceased, whereas pigeons continued to respond, especially on low schedule values. The running rate of responses (calculated by excluding the postreinforcement pause) was related to the duration of the preceding postreinforcement pause for rats but not for pigeons. Changes in response rate in successive segments of the interval were best described by normal curves. The relationship between midpoints of the normal curves and schedule value was a power function, with an exponent of less than one for pigeons but greater than one for rats. These differences could be explained in terms of a basic difference between the key-peck and lever-press responses, the two being differently affected by the response-eliciting properties of food.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pigeons' performance under differential reinforcement of low rate schedules depends upon the operantLearning and Motivation, 1975
- TWO‐COMPONENT SCHEDULES OF DIFFERENTIAL‐REINFORCEMENT‐OF‐LOW‐RATE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975
- TIME LIMITS FOR COMPLETING FIXED RATIOS. III. STIMULUS VARIABLES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification.Psychological Review, 1974
- A COMPARISON OF MEASURES OF RESPONDING UNDER FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973
- Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning.Psychological Review, 1972
- Independence of postreinforcement pause length and running rate on fixed-interval pacing reinforcement schedulesPsychonomic Science, 1971
- A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- EFFECTS OF A DRL CONTINGENCY ADDED TO A FIXED‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964
- The misbehavior of organisms.American Psychologist, 1961