The New Statistics
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 12 November 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 25 (1) , 7-29
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966
Abstract
We need to make substantial changes to how we conduct research. First, in response to heightened concern that our published research literature is incomplete and untrustworthy, we need new requirements to ensure research integrity. These include prespecification of studies whenever possible, avoidance of selection and other inappropriate data-analytic practices, complete reporting, and encouragement of replication. Second, in response to renewed recognition of the severe flaws of null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST), we need to shift from reliance on NHST to estimation and other preferred techniques. The new statistics refers to recommended practices, including estimation based on effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. The techniques are not new, but adopting them widely would be new for many researchers, as well as highly beneficial. This article explains why the new statistics are important and offers guidance for their use. It describes an eight-step new-statistics strategy for research with integrity, which starts with formulation of research questions in estimation terms, has no place for NHST, and is aimed at building a cumulative quantitative discipline.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Confidence intervals permit, but don’t guarantee, better inference than statistical significance testingFrontiers in Psychology, 2010
- Theory Testing Using Quantitative Predictions of Effect SizeApplied Psychology, 2008
- Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter EstimationAnnual Review of Psychology, 2008
- Inference by Eye: Pictures of Confidence Intervals and Thinking About Levels of ConfidenceTeaching Statistics, 2007
- Error bars in experimental biologyThe Journal of cell biology, 2007
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data.American Psychologist, 2005
- Editors Can Lead Researchers to Confidence Intervals, but Can't Make Them ThinkPsychological Science, 2004
- Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2003
- The Abuse of PowerThe American Statistician, 2001