Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal Mammograms
- 15 April 1991
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 114 (8) , 657-661
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-657
Abstract
To evaluate women's psychological responses to abnormal mammograms and the effect on mammography adherence. To identify psychological responses and other factors that predict mammography adherence in women with normal or abnormal mammograms. Survey study with prospective analysis of factors associated with mammography adherence. Health Maintenance Organization of Pennsylvania and New Jersey (HMO PA/NJ). Study patients, members of HMO PA/NJ who were 50 years of age or older, and who had had mammography done 3 months earlier, included women with normal mammograms (n = 121), women with low-suspicion mammograms (n = 119), and women with high-suspicion mammograms (n = 68), but not women with breast cancer. Psychological responses 3 months after mammography and adherence to subsequent annual mammography were assessed. Women with high-suspicion mammograms had substantial mammography-related anxiety (47%) and worries about breast cancer (41%). Such worries affected the moods (26%) and daily functioning (17%) of these women, despite diagnostic evaluation excluding malignancy. For each variable, a consistent trend (P greater than 0.05) was seen with degree of mammogram abnormality. Sixty-eight percent of women with normal results, 78% of women with low-suspicion results, and 74% of women with high-suspicion results obtained their subsequent annual mammograms (P greater than 0.05). The number of previous mammograms (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.2) and the effect of the previous results on concerns about breast cancer (odds ratio, 0.5; CI, 0.2 to 1.0) were independent predictors of adherence in logistic regression analyses (P less than 0.05). A substantial proportion of women with suspicious mammograms have psychological difficulties, even after learning that they do not have cancer. Such sequelae do not appear to interfere with subsequent adherence.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How valid are mammography self-reports?American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screeningPreventive Medicine, 1990
- Reactions of asbestos‐exposed workers to notification and screeningAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1989
- Performance of Breast Self-Examination by Women at High Risk for Breast CancerWomen & Health, 1987
- Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Women with Proliferative Breast DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Labelling in hypertension: A review of the behavioural and psychological consequencesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Psychological side-effects of the mass screening on cervical cancerSocial Science & Medicine, 1984
- Notification of workers at high risk: an emerging public health problem.American Journal of Public Health, 1984
- The health belief model and participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer: A comparative analysisSocial Science & Medicine, 1984
- Preventive health behavior: A review of research and issues.Health Psychology, 1983