Investigating patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark
- 28 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 22 (2) , 211-218
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462306051038
Abstract
Objectives:The objective of this study was to analyze preferences for activities comprised in comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation programs among former cardiac patients from three different hospitals in Copenhagen County, Denmark.Methods:A discrete choice experiment was applied to elicit the preferences for the offer of participation in various cardiac rehabilitation program activities: smoking cessation course, physical exercise program, personal meetings with cardiac nurse, group meetings managed by cardiac nurses, and nutritional counseling guidance. The questionnaire was sent to 742 former cardiac patients. We had a response rate of 69 percent.Results:We found that preferences differed with respect to gender and age and that the offer of participation in cardiac rehabilitation activities was not highly valued by older patients, in particular among older men.Conclusions:The discrete choice experiment proved a valuable instrument for the measurement of preferences for cardiac rehabilitation. The study provides important information on patients' preferences for cardiac rehabilitation for healthcare professionals and decision makers.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictorsHeart, 2005
- Nutritional counselling in primary health care: a randomized comparison of an intervention by general practitioner or dieticianEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2004
- Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: discrete choice experimentBMJ, 2004
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Percutaneous Revascularization, Heart Transplant, Heart Valve Surgery, and for Chronic Heart FailureaChest, 2003
- Valuing the benefits and costs of health care programmes: where's the ‘extra’ in extra-welfarism?Social Science & Medicine, 2003
- Does it matter who you are or what you gain? an experimental study of preferences for resource allocationHealth Economics, 2002
- Women's and Men's Preferences for Cardiac Rehabilitation Program FeaturesJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1996
- Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation soon after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete ResponsesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984
- A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927