The Goldman algorithm revisited: Prospective evaluation of a computer-derived algorithm versus unaided physician judgment in suspected acute myocardial infarction
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 138 (4) , 705-709
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70186-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of the Need for Intensive Care in Patients Who Come to Emergency Departments with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Cost-effectiveness of a new short-stay unit to “rule out” acute myocardial infarction in low risk patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Acute myocardial infarction in chest pain patients with nondiagnostic ECGs: Serial CK-MB sampling in the emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Reducing unnecessary coronary care unit admissionsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1990
- Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarctionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Use of the Initial Electrocardiogram to Predict In-Hospital Complications of Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Electrocardiographic and clinical criteria for recognition of acute myocardial infarction based on analysis of 3,697 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- A Computer-Derived Protocol to Aid in the Diagnosis of Emergency Room Patients with Acute Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982