Paying for Kidneys: The Case against Prohibition
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 12 (1) , 17-45
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2002.0004
Abstract
We argue that healthy people should be allowed to sell one of their kidneys while they are alive—that the current prohibition on payment for kidneys ought to be overturned. Our argument has three parts. First, we argue that the moral basis for the current policy on live kidney donations and on the sale of other kinds of tissue implies that we ought to legalize the sale of kidneys. Second, we address the objection that the sale of kidneys is intrinsically wrong because it violates the Kantian duty of respect for humanity. Third, we address a range of consequentialist objections based on the idea that kidney sales will be exploitative. Throughout the paper, we argue only that it ought to be legal for an individual to receive payment for a kidney. We do not argue that it ought to be legal for an individual to buy a kidney.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Commerce in organs: a Kantian critique.Journal of Social Philosophy, 1999
- Selling Bits and Pieces of Humans to Make Babies: The Gift of the Magi RevisitedJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1999
- The case for allowing kidney salesThe Lancet, 1998
- The Market for Bodily Parts: a response to Ruth ChadwickJournal of Applied Philosophy, 1991
- The kidney trade: or, the customer is always wrong.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1990
- The Market for Bodily Parts: Kant and duties to oneselfJournal of Applied Philosophy, 1989
- A History and Theory of Informed Consent. By Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp (with Nancy M. P. King) (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. xv, 392p. $29.95).American Political Science Review, 1988
- Market-InalienabilityHarvard Law Review, 1987
- My Body, My PropertyHastings Center Report, 1986
- Right and WrongPublished by Harvard University Press ,1978