Comparative analysis of thermodynamic approaches and diagnostic liquids for determination of contact angle-derived physicochemical parameters of solids coated with conditioning films: A practitioner's perspective
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology
- Vol. 11 (1) , 65-93
- https://doi.org/10.1163/156856197x01029
Abstract
The equation of state (ES), the Lifshitz-van der Waals acid-base approach (LWAB), and the geometric mean equation (GME) were evaluated for calculation of physicochemical parameters from contact angles of the four diagnostic liquids: water (w), formamide (f), α-bromonaphthalene (α-br), and diiodomethane (di) measured on clean and conditioning film-coated substrata (stainless steel, germanium, polypropylene, perspex). Surface free energy and its components (dispersive and polar components in GME, as well as Lifshitz-van der Waals, electron-donor and electron-acceptor components in LWAB) were assessed in all approaches with all liquid combinations possible. The Gram-negative bacterium SW8 grown under carbon-limited conditions was used to calculate the solid-bacterium interfacial free energy and the free energy of adhesion of SW8 to solid substrata. These two parameters and the solid-liquid interfacial free energy were calculated only for combinations of diagnostic liquids that included water contact angles. Actual values of physicochemical parameters on high and low energy interfaces often differed between approaches or within an approach when different diagnostic liquids or combinations thereof were used. However, the same values of surface free energy were obtained on high and medium energy surfaces with the combinations LWAB w/f/di, LWAB w/f/α-br, ES f, GME f/α-br, and GME f/di. Approaches involving polar liquids produced similar trends for surface free energy and solid-liquid interfacial free energy. Results obtained with ES on high and low energy substrata were not consistent with fundamental premises of the theory and the dispersive component of surface free energy was generally underestimated in the GME approach. LWAB w/f/di was found to be the most suitable approach for analysis of the surfaces investigated in this work.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- An equation-of-state approach to determine surface tensions of low-energy solids from contact anglesPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Retention of the Gram-negative bacterium SW8 on surfaces under conditions relevant to the subsurface environment: Effects of conditioning films and substratum natureFEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1994
- Retention of the Gramnegative marine bacterium SW8 on surfaces — effects of microbial physiology, substratum nature and conditioning filmsColloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 1994
- Development of methods for surface free energy determination using contact angles of liquids on solidsAdvances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1992
- Contact angles on hydrophobic solid surfaces and their interpretationJournal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1992
- Knowledge about polymer surfaces from contact angle measurementsAdvances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1990
- Solid surface tension: The interpretation of contact angles by the equation of state approach and the theory of surface tension componentsLangmuir, 1986
- The role of van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds in “hydrophobic interactions” between biopolymers and low energy surfacesJournal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1986
- On the surface thermodynamics of a two—component liquid-vapor-ideal solid systemJournal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1974
- Estimation of the surface free energy of polymersJournal of Applied Polymer Science, 1969