Style, Chauvet and radiocarbon
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- method
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 77 (295) , 142-145
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00061433
Abstract
The article by Bahn and Pettitt (above) carries the suggestion that the diverse dates obtained for Candamo in some way throw doubt on those for Chauvet and by implication on the performance of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE) at Yvette-sur-Gif (Gif). The authors respond. Readers might also like to note the article by Marian Scott and colleagues which follows.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evolution of prehistoric cave artNature, 2001
- Radiocarbon AMS Dates for Paleolithic Cave PaintingsRadiocarbon, 2001
- Thematic changes in Upper Palaeolithic art: a view from the Grotte ChauvetPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- THE OXFORD ACCELERATOR MASS SPECTROMETRY FACILITY: TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ROUTINE DATINGArchaeometry, 1989
- The AMS Dating of Separate Fractions in ArchaeologyRadiocarbon, 1986