Mathematical Assumptions versus Biological Reality: Myths in Affected Sib Pair Linkage Analysis
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 76 (1) , 152-156
- https://doi.org/10.1086/426872
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transmission-Ratio Distortion and Allele Sharing in Affected Sib Pairs: A New Linkage Statistic with Reduced Bias, with Application to Chromosome 6q25.3American Journal of Human Genetics, 2004
- Reply to Cordell and FarrallAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Affected-Sib-Pair Data Can Be Used to Distinguish Two-Locus Heterogeneity from Two-Locus EpistasisAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Reports of the Death of the Epistasis Model Are Greatly ExaggeratedAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Two-Locus Heterogeneity Cannot Be Distinguished from Two-Locus Epistasis on the Basis of Affected-Sib-Pair DataAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Composite Statistics for QTL Mapping with Moderately Discordant Sibling PairsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2000
- Possible linkage relationships between certain blood groups and schizophrenia or other psychosesBehavior Genetics, 1973
- The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locusBehavior Genetics, 1972
- The Expected “Bombay” Groups OhA1 and OhA2Transfusion, 1961
- THE DETECTION OF AUTOSOMAL LINKAGE IN DATA WHICH CONSIST OF PAIRS OF BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF UNSPECIFIED PARENTAGEAnnals of Eugenics, 1935