Pouch size: The important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 77 (3) , 265-269
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770310
Abstract
Sixty-seven patients with a J-shaped ileoanal pouch were studied over a 2-year period with regular recording of sphincter and pouch characteristics and analysis of their role in functional outcome. Although there was a 27 per cent permanent reduction in resting anal pressure (RAP) (P<0–001), two-thirds of the patients still had a RAP within the normal range. The mean(s.d.) pouch volume increased during the first year from 132(46) ml to 282(85) ml. RAP was not related to functional outcome and preoperative RAP was not predictive of subsequent function. Large pouch volume and compliance correlated with low defaecation frequency (range of r = 0·27–0·36; P <0·05) and good overall function (r = 0·37·0·56; P<0·01). The initial pouch volume was predictive of subsequent overall function. The Heal length used for pouch construction predicted subsequent pouch volume (r = 0·48; P < 0·001) and to some extent functional outcome (r = 0·28·0·37; P<0·05). However, the studied variables accounted for only 21 per cent of the total variance of functional outcome.Keywords
Funding Information
- Swedish Medical Research Council (17X-03117)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomyInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1989
- Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Discrimination is not impaired by excision of the anal transition zone after restorative proctocolectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Preservation of the entire anal canal in conservative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: A pilot study comparing end-to-end ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal resection with mucosal proctectomy and endo-anal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- S-pouches vs. J-pouchesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1987
- Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouchDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1987
- Comparison of the function of triplicated and duplicated pelvic ileal reservoirs after mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- The critical level for preservation of continence in the ileoanal anastomosisJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1985
- Anal Sphincter Function After Colectomy, Mucosal Proctectomy, and Endorectal Ileoanal Pull-throughArchives of Surgery, 1984
- Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: a pathophysiological assessment.Gut, 1981