Carcinogenic potency correlations: Real or artifactual?
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health
- Vol. 32 (1) , 1-9
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15287399109531461
Abstract
It has been suggested by various investigators that observed interspecies correlations of carcinogenic potency estimates based on bioassays are to a degree due to tautologous aspects of experimental designs. Some authors have even suggested that carcinogenic potency estimates derived from chronic bioassays are little more than experimental design artifacts. In this paper it is argued that constraints imposed by the use of the one‐hit model to estimate carcinogenic potency are more restrictive than potential experimental design constraints.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experimental design constraints on carcinogenic potency estimatesJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1989
- One‐Hit Models of Carcinogenesis: Conservative or Not?Risk Analysis, 1988
- Carcinogenic Risk Assessment: Comparison of Estimated Safe Doses for Rats and MiceEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 1987
- Tautology or not tautology?Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1987
- Pharmacokinetics in low dose extrapolation using animal cancer dataFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1986
- Some tautologous aspects of the comparison of carcinogenic potency in rats and miceFundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1985
- A Carcinogenic Potency Database of the Standardized Results of Animal BioassaysEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 1984
- Estimation and Extrapolation of Tumor Probabilities from a Mouse Bioassay with Survival/Sacrifice ComponentsRisk Analysis, 1982
- Interspecies comparison of carcinogenic potencyJournal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1979