Chimeric conundra: are nucleomorphs and chromists monophyletic or polyphyletic?
- 22 November 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 91 (24) , 11368-11372
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.24.11368
Abstract
All algae with chloroplasts located not freely in the cytosol, but inside two extra membranes, probably arose chimerically by the permanent fusion of two different eukaryote cells: a protozoan host and a eukaryotic algal symbiont. Two such groups, cryptomonads (phylum Cryptista) and Chlorarachniophyta, still retain a DNA-containing relic of the nucleus of the algal endosymbiont, known as the nucleomorph, as well as the host nucleus. These two phyla were traditionally assumed to have obtained their chloroplasts separately by two independent symbioses. We have sequenced the nuclear and the nucleomorph 18S rRNA genes of the nonphotosynthetic cryptomonad Chilomonas paramecium. Our phylogenetic analysis suggests that cryptomonad and chlorarachniophyte nucleomorphs may be related to each other and raises the possibility that both phyla may have diverged from a common ancestral chimeric cell that originated by a single endosymbiosis involving an algal endosymbiont related to the ancestor of red algae. But, because of the instability of the molecular trees when different taxa are added, there is insufficient evidence to overturn the traditional view that Chlorarachnion nucleomorphs evolved separately from a relative of green algae. The four phyla that contain chromophyte algae (those with chlorophyll c--i.e., Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta, Dinozoa) are distantly related to each other and to Chlorarachniophyta on our trees. However, all of the photosynthetic taxa within each of these four phyla radiate from each other very substantially after the radiation of the four phyla themselves. This favors the view that the common ancestor of these four phyla was not photosynthetic and that chloroplasts were implanted separately into each much more recently. This probable polyphyly of the chromophyte algae, if confirmed, would make it desirable to treat Cryptista, Heterokonta, and Haptophyta as separate kingdoms, rather than to group them together in the single kingdom Chromista.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence that an amoeba acquired a chloroplast by retaining part of an engulfed eukaryotic alga.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1994
- The photosynthetic endosymbiont in cryptomonad cells produces both chloroplast and cytoplasmic-type ribosomesJournal of Cell Science, 1994
- Kingdom protozoa and its 18 phyla.1993
- The gamma subunit of R-phycoerythrin and its possible mode of transport into the plastid of red algaeJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1993
- Monophyletic Origins of the Metazoa: an Evolutionary Link with FungiScience, 1993
- cDNA cloning and characterization of the nuclear gene encoding chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from the marine red alga Gracilaria verrucosaCurrent Genetics, 1993
- The Early Evolution of Eukaryotes: A Geological PerspectiveScience, 1992
- The number of symbiotic origins of organellesBiosystems, 1992
- Demonstration of nucleomorph-encoded eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNA in cryptomonadsMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 1991
- The evolutionary origin and phylogeny of microtubules, mitotic spindles and eukaryote flagellaBiosystems, 1978