ERS‐1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2 cm challenge
- 15 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
- Vol. 103 (C4) , 8045-8057
- https://doi.org/10.1029/97jc01917
Abstract
The ERS orbit error reduction method using TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) data as a reference [Le Traon et al., 1995a] was applied to ERS‐1 cycles from phases C, E, F, and G and to the first 16 cycles of the ERS‐2 mission (phase A). T/P M‐GDR (geophysical data record) (version C) and ERS‐1/2 ocean product (OPR) data were used. ERS‐1/2 orbits are the D‐PAF (processing and archiving facility) orbits and, when necessary, ERS‐1/2 altimetric corrections were updated to make the T/P and ERS‐1/2 corrections homogeneous. The adjustment method has been refined, and formal error on the estimation is now calculated. The ERS‐1/2 orbit error estimation is thus estimated to be precise to within about 2 cm root‐mean‐square (rms). E‐E crossover differences are reduced from 12 to 17 cm to only 6.5 cm rms for all processed cycles. Similarly, the T/P‐E crossover differences are reduced from 11 to 14 cm to only 7 cm rms. The adjusted D‐PAF orbit error varies between 6 and 12 cm rms. The adjustment has also been performed for the Joint Gravity Model 3(JGM 3) orbits of ERS‐I phases C, E, and F. The rms difference between the corrected orbits for the D‐PAF and JGM 3 orbits is only about 1 cm rms, while it is about 11 cm before T/P orbit error correction. This shows that the adjustment is almost insensitive to the initial ERS‐I orbit used. It also confirms the 2 cm precision of the method. We also do repeat‐track analysis on the 35 day repeat cycles of ERS‐I phase C. The mean difference in sea level variance before and after orbit error correction is 34 cm2 (D‐PAF orbit) and 17 cm2 (JGM 3 orbit). The corrected ERS‐1 and T/P sea level variabilities, however, are in excellent agreement. The study thus shows that ERS‐1/2 orbit error must be corrected before analyzing large‐scale oceanic signals and combining ERS‐1/2 with T/P data. The proposed method provides a very effective correction and thus significantly enhances the quality of ERS‐1/2 data. Corresponding data sets will be distributed to the scientific community by Archiving, Validation, and Interpretation of Satellite Oceanographic Data (AVISO).Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Improved Mapping Method of Multisatellite Altimeter DataJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1998
- First results of reduced dynamics with DORIS on TOPEX/Poseidon and SPOTJournal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996
- Mapping mesoscale variability of the Azores Current using TOPEX/POSEIDON and ERS 1 altimetry, together with hydrographic and Lagrangian measurementsJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1995
- The temporal and spatial characteristics of TOPEX/POSEIDON radial orbit errorJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1995
- Using Topex/Poseidon Data to EnhanceERS-1DataJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1995
- Satellites work in tandem to improve accuracy of dataEos, 1995
- ERS-1 radial position refinement by dual crossover analysis with TOPEX/PoseidonAdvances In Space Research, 1995
- Estimating the sea state bias of the TOPEX and POSEIDON altimeters from crossover differencesJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1994
- TOPEX/POSEIDON mission overviewJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1994
- Corrected Tables of Tidal HarmonicsGeophysical Journal International, 1973