Standards for Surgical Complication Reporting in Urologic Oncology: Time for a Change
- 1 February 2007
- Vol. 69 (2) , 221-225
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.056
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The NSQIP: A new frontier in surgerySurgery, 2005
- IDENTIFYING RISK FACTORS FOR POTENTIALLY AVOIDABLE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING RADICAL CYSTECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2005
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Complications of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in a Large Contemporary CohortJournal of Urology, 2004
- CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatmentSeminars in Radiation Oncology, 2003
- Complications of Primary Nerve Sparing Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis: Experience of the German Testicular Cancer Study GroupJournal of Urology, 2003
- Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical LiteratureAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: THE MONTSOURIS 3-YEAR EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, 2002
- Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramBJU International, 2000
- Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: A new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgeryJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1997