On Non-Anaphor Reflexives
- 27 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Consortium Erudit in Revue québécoise de linguistique
- Vol. 15 (2) , 135-165
- https://doi.org/10.7202/602565ar
Abstract
In this paper, we present an analysis of French reflexives wherein we distinguish between anaphor and referential reflexives. Each type of reflexive corresponds to a distinct set of properties. We show that the clitic se possesses the properties of the anaphor while the forms lui/lui-même possess the properties of referential reflexives. We formulate the following hypothesis: the anaphor is an operator whose domain is VP and which is positioned in French in the syntatic component. In this position, the anaphor can be indexed by the subject which becomes its antecedent. The indexation procedure occurs via the rule of Predication at Logical Form. French thus differs from English (which also possesses two types of reflexive) in that the English reflexive is positioned only at LF. We demonstrate how the various properties of the two reflexives fall out from our analysis (for both languages), showing that overt reflexives can be described without resorting to the binding theory.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Une Solution Pour Un Apparent Contre-Exemple a La Théorie Du LiagePublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1982
- VARIABLES AND THE BIJECTION PRINCIPLEThe Linguistic Review, 1982
- 4. Logical Operators, Complete Constituents, and Extraction TransformationsPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1981
- Argument Structure and MorphologyThe Linguistic Review, 1981
- Coréférences Et Pronoms RéfléchisPublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1980
- Anaphora in Generative GrammarPublished by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,1979
- Locality principles in syntaxPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1978
- Great expectations: An intensive self analysisLinguistics and Philosophy, 1978
- Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun PhrasesPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1974
- Rules for English PronominalizationLanguage, 1963