Patients' Decision-Making Process Regarding Participation in Phase I Oncology Research
- 20 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (27) , 4479-4484
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.06.0269
Abstract
Purpose This study assesses the decision-making process of patients enrolling in phase I oncology studies. Patients and Methods Participants were eligible if they had consented to participate in a phase I cancer study at one of five cancer centers, understood English, and were older than 18 years. Trained interviewers conducted structured in-person interviews. Results Of the 163 participants, 88% were white, 96% had health insurance, and 51% were college graduates or post graduates. Overall, 81% were aware of hospice, but only 6% had seriously considered hospice for themselves; 84% were aware of palliative care and 10% seriously considered it for themselves; and 7% considered getting no treatment at all. Overall, 75% reported moderate or a lot of pressure to participate in the phase I study because their cancer was growing, whereas 7% reported such pressure from the study investigators and 9% felt such pressure from their families. For 63% of patients, the most important information for decision making was that the phase I drug killed cancer cells; only 12% reported that the adverse effects of the drug(s) was the most useful information. More than 90% of patients said they would still participate in the study even if the experimental drug caused serious adverse effects, including a 10% chance of dying. Conclusion Patients are aware of many alternatives to phase I studies, but do not seriously consider them. Very few experience pressure from family or researchers to participate in research. Their main goal is to fight their cancer, and almost no adverse effect, including death, would dissuade them from enrolling.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of the Internet to Obtain Cancer Information Among Cancer Patients at an Urban County HospitalJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trialsCancer, 2004
- An Exploration of Relative Health Stock in Advanced Cancer PatientsMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Perceptions of Patients and Physicians Regarding Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: Implications for Physician-Patient CommunicationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trialsCancer, 2003
- Descriptions of Benefits and Risks in Consent Forms for Phase 1 Oncology TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Clarifying the Ethics of Clinical Research: A Path toward Avoiding the Therapeutic MisconceptionAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2002
- Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional surveyThe Lancet, 2001
- Patient motivation and informed consent in a phase I study of an anticancer agentEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1984
- The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric researchInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1982