Use of clinical pharmacists to reduce cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin costs
- 1 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
- Vol. 39 (7) , 1176-1180
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/39.7.1176
Abstract
The financial impact of using cefamandole and cefoxitin rather than cefazolin and of using ticarcillin rather than carbenicillin in one institution was assessed; the effectiveness of clinical pharmacists in reducing the costs associated with these drugs also was determined. During Phase 1 (July 1, 1980-March 31, 1981), the numbers of intravenous piggyback cefazolin, cephalothin, cefamandole, cefoxitin, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin doses prepared were recorded. Quarterly purchase data for each drug were determined from invoice records. During Phase 2 (April 1, 1981-September 30, 1981), eight clinical pharmacists reviewed all patient charts for cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin orders. If the indication for these orders was missing or considered inappropriate, the pharmacist contacted the prescriber and recommended substituting appropriate doses of cefazolin for cefamandole and cefoxitin and of carbenicillin for ticarcillin. The number of doses prepared and quarterly purchase data were collected as in Phase 1. The projected savings resulting from clinical pharmacist input relating to these drugs was calculated. Based on Phase 1 data, the total theoretical expense resulting from cefamandole and cefoxitin use instead of cefazolin and from ticarcillin use in place of carbenicillin was projected to be $233,448 annually. Cefamandole and cefoxitin accounted for 59.8 and 39.7% of total cephalosporin use in Phases 1 and 2, respectively. Ticarcillin accounted for 77.1% of the total ticarcillin and carbenicillin doses in Phase 1, and 16.6% in Phase 2. A projected annual savings of $156,756 was achieved because of clinical pharmacist input at a cost of $16,000 for time devoted to the effort. Clinical pharmacists were effective in reducing the use of cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin in situations where cefazolin or carbenicillin could be substituted.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: