Application of analytic hierarchy process for measuring and comparing the global performance of intensive care units
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Critical Care
- Vol. 20 (2) , 117-124
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.04.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rating the quality of intensive care units: Is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Measuring intensive care unit performance: A way to move forward *Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- If most intensive care units are graduating with honors, is it genuine quality or grade inflation? *Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for elderly patients with severe pneumoniaIntensive Care Medicine, 2000
- Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluations II and III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: A prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- SEVERITY SCORING AND OUTCOME ASSESSMENTCritical Care Clinics, 1999
- Prediction of the risk of death by APACHE II scoring in critically ill trauma patients without head injuryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996
- ICU SCORING SYSTEMS ALLOW PREDICTION OF PATIENT OUTCOMES AND COMPARISON OF ICU PERFORMANCECritical Care Clinics, 1996
- Intensive Care Societyʼs Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) study in Britain and IrelandCritical Care Medicine, 1994