Covariate heterogeneity in meta‐analysis: Criteria for deciding between meta‐regression and individual patient data
- 29 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 26 (15) , 2982-2999
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2768
Abstract
Meta‐analyses of clinical trials are increasingly seeking to go beyond estimating the effect of a treatment and may also aim to investigate the effect of other covariates and how they alter treatment effectiveness. This requires the estimation of treatment‐covariate interactions. Meta‐regression can be used to estimate such interactions using published data, but it is known to lack statistical power, and is prone to bias.The use of individual patient data can improve estimation of such interactions, among other benefits, but it can be difficult and time‐consuming to collect and analyse. This paper derives, under certain conditions, the power of meta‐regression and IPD methods to detect treatment–covariate interactions. These power formulae are shown to depend on heterogeneity in the covariate distributions across studies. This allows the derivation of simple tests, based on heterogeneity statistics, for comparing the statistical power of the analysis methods. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- To IPD or not to IPD?Evaluation & the Health Professions, 2002
- Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reportingStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enoughThe Lancet, 1998
- A Comparison of Meta-analytic Results Using Literature vs Individual Patient DataJAMA, 1995
- Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Efficacy of BCG Vaccine in the Prevention of TuberculosisJAMA, 1994
- Controversies in meta-analysis: the case of the trials of serum cholesterol reductionStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- A general parametric approach to the meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1Epidemiologic Reviews, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986