Statistical Significance Tests, Effect Size Reporting and the Vain Pursuit of Pseudo-Objectivity
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Theory & Psychology
- Vol. 9 (2) , 191-196
- https://doi.org/10.1177/095935439992007
Abstract
Two themes are argued in this comment on the use of statistical significance tests. First, effect sizes are an important aspect of results that should be reported. However, 10 empirical studies (some of several different journals) of articles in various disciplines demonstrate that effect sizes are still not usually being reported, notwithstanding the admonitions of the 1994 American Psychological Association (APA) Publication Manual. Second, using statistical significance tests does not (and cannot) make scientists (or their science) objective.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA AnalysesReview of Educational Research, 1998
- In praise of brilliance: Where that praise really belongs.American Psychologist, 1998
- Rejoinder: Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance Tests: Further CommentsEducational Researcher, 1997
- Research news and Comment: Reflections on Statistical and Substantive Significance, With a Slice of ReplicationEducational Researcher, 1997
- Editorial.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing.Psychological Methods, 1996
- Research news and Comment: AERA Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance Testing: Three Suggested ReformsEducational Researcher, 1996
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- A Single Contrast Test ProcedureEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1988
- Research for ActionEducational Researcher, 1978