Biomarkers of Cancer Risk and Therapeutic Benefit: New Technologies, New Opportunities, and Some Challenges
Open Access
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Toxicologic Pathology
- Vol. 32 (1_suppl) , 99-105
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230490425067
Abstract
The biotechnology revolution offers unprecedented opportunities for identification of mechanistically-based biomarkers that report and predict cancer and other pathologies. The combination of genomic technologies with a knowledge of gene sequence and sequence conservation has made available markers that facilitate the correlation of genetic variation with biological outcomes, and “-omic” technologies allow efficient biochemical characterization of functional pathways—providing new markers of the susceptibility of individuals to cancer development, and of tumor susceptibility to specific therapies. New therapeutic agents targeted to individuals with specific genetic or biochemical characteristics already exist. The powerful -omic technologies allow efficient monitoring of gene transcripts, proteins, and intermediary metabolites, making it possible to monitor a large number of key cellular pathways simultaneously. This has enabled the identification of key biomarkers and signaling molecules associated with cell growth, cell death, and cellular metabolism. These new markers are facilitating monitoring of functional disturbance, molecular and cellular damage, and damage-response. Improved imaging technologies have made it feasible to image some of these molecular events noninvasively. To meet the challenge of evaluating and developing consensus criteria for the application of these new technologies and biomarkers, consortium approaches are being increasingly undertaken to share resources and to build a common understanding among the research, industry, and regulatory communities. These developments promise more efficient pharmaceutical product development, safer and more efficacious drugs, and provide clinical practitioners with new and better biomarkers for cancer screening, patient monitoring, and choice of therapy.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Utility of Genetically Modified Mouse Assays for Identifying Human Carcinogens: A Basic Understanding and Path ForwardToxicological Sciences, 2004
- Serum Troponins as Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Cardiac ToxicityToxicologic Pathology, 2004
- A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual frameworkClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2001
- In vivo transgenic mutation assaysEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 2000
- Serum laminin and type IV collagen are accurate markers of histologically severe alcoholic hepatitis in patients with cirrhosisJournal of Hepatology, 2000
- Tk+/− mouse model for detecting in vivo mutation in an endogenous, autosomal geneMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 1999
- Other transgenic mutation assays:APRT: A versatile in vivo resident reporter of local mutation and loss of heterozygosityEnvironmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, 1996
- Transgenic Animal Models for Detection of In Vivo MutationsAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1995
- Induction of hepatic mutations in lacI transgenic miceMutagenesis, 1993