What this Field Needs is a Good Nomological Network
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
- Vol. 45 (3) , 314-323
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149708416132
Abstract
Research in the field of hypnosis lacks a coherent structure on which to build. This lack of a mature nornological network stems from fundamental disagreements concerning the construct validity of hypnotizability, which in turn stem in part from different research practices across laboratories. For these reasons, the field has had less impact on psychology and medicine than is warranted by the numerous sophisticated scientific studies that have been conducted during the past three decades.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape.American Psychologist, 1995
- The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Normative and Comparative DataInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1993
- On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- A Pavlovian analysis of goal-directed behavior.American Psychologist, 1987
- A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Multiple predictors of hypnotic susceptibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative Data and Psychometric PropertiesPsychological Reports, 1983
- Practicing the two disciplines for relaxation and enlightenment: Comment on "Role of the feedback signal in electromyograph biofeedback: The relevance of attention" by Qualls and Sheehan.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981
- Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction.American Psychologist, 1975
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955