"Riding the Bull at Gilley's": Convicted Rapists Describe the Rewards of Rape
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 32 (3) , 251-263
- https://doi.org/10.2307/800685
Abstract
In this paper we argue that the popular image of rape, a nonutilitarian act committed by a few “sick” men, is too limited a view of sexual violence because it excludes culture and social structure as pre-disposing factors. Our data come from interviews with 114 convicted, incarcerated rapists. Looking at rape from the perspective of rapists, we attempt to discover the function of sexual violence in their lives; what their behavior gained for them in a society seeming prone to rape. Our analysis reveals that a number of rapists used sexual violence as a method of revenge and/or punishment while others used it as a means of gaining access to unwilling or unavailable women. In some cases, rape was just a bonus added to burglary or robbery. Rape was also a recreational activity and described as an “adventure” and an “exciting” form of impersonal sex which gained the offender power over his victim(s).Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Convicted Rapists' Vocabulary of Motive: Excuses and JustificationsSocial Problems, 1984
- Sexually Aggressive Men: Empirical Findings and Theoretical ImplicationsPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- Crime as Social ControlAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Testing hypotheses regarding rape: Exposure to sexual violence, sex differences, and the “normality” of rapistsJournal of Research in Personality, 1980
- Criminal Homicide as a Situated TransactionSocial Problems, 1977
- Violent Crime: A Symbolic Interactionist Study*Symbolic Interaction, 1977
- Cross-Cultural Codes on Twenty Sexual Attitudes and PracticesEthnology, 1976
- The Social Content of PornographyJournal of Communication, 1976
- Male Sex Aggression on a University CampusAmerican Sociological Review, 1957
- A study of Rorschach flexor and extensor human movement responsesJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1955