WHAT EXPLAINS HADZA FOOD SHARING?
- 11 November 2004
- book chapter
- Published by Emerald Publishing
Abstract
Most hypotheses proposed to explain human food sharing address motives, yet most tests of these hypotheses have measured only the patterns of food transfer. To choose between these hypotheses we need to measure people’s propensity to share. To do that, I played two games (the Ultimatum and Dictator Games) with Hadza hunter-gatherers. Despite their ubiquitous food sharing, the Hadza are less willing to share in these games than people in complex societies are. They were also less willing to share in smaller camps than larger camps. I evaluate the various food-sharing hypotheses in light of these results.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Showing off, handicap signaling, and the evolution of men's workEvolutionary Anthropology, 2002
- Costly Signaling and CooperationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2001
- Hadza meat sharingEvolution and Human Behavior, 2001
- Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian AmazonAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Food Transfers Among Hiwi Foragers of Venezuela: Tests of ReciprocityHuman Ecology, 2000
- Delayed Reciprocity and Tolerated Theft: The Behavioral Ecology of Food-Sharing StrategiesCurrent Anthropology, 1997
- Hadza Children's Foraging: Juvenile Dependency, Social Arrangements, and Mobility among Hunter-GatherersCurrent Anthropology, 1995
- Anomalies: Ultimatums, Dictators and MannersJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1995
- Showing offEthology and Sociobiology, 1991
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964