Institutional economic theory: the old versus the new
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Review of Political Economy
- Vol. 1 (3) , 249-269
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000021
Abstract
The object of this paper is to make some limited comparisons between the ‘new’ institutionalism of Williamson, Schotter, Hayek and others and the ‘old’ institutionalism, particularly of Veblen. It is argued that a fundamental feature of the ‘new’ institutionalism in which it contrasts with the ‘old’ is its close attachment to the idea of the abstract individual of classic liberal ideology. This attachment is found even in those minority subsets of ‘new’ institutionalists who are hostile to promarket policies, or non-neoclassical in matters of theory. Consequently, ‘old’ institutionalist warnings against proceeding on such individualistic assumptions should not be ignored, despite the value of much ‘new’ institutionalist analysis.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk and Culture: A Missing Link in the Post Keynesian TraditionJournal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1986
- Microeconomics, Norms, and RationalityEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1984
- Profiles and Critiques in Social TheoryPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- RISK PERCEPTION IN PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICSEconomic Inquiry, 1982
- The problem with neoclassical institutional economics: A critique with special reference to the North/Thomas model of pre-1500 EuropeExplorations in Economic History, 1981
- On the Explanation of Rules Using Rational Choice ModelsJournal of Economic Issues, 1979
- The Innovating FirmPublished by Springer Nature ,1979
- Social psychology.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1952
- Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 1950
- The Nature of the FirmEconomica, 1937