Beyond performance measurement? Assessing ‘value’ in local government
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Local Government Studies
- Vol. 24 (4) , 1-25
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939808433925
Abstract
As reforms of the public sector have introduced market relationships and private sector management practices, a ‘managerialist’ conception of accountability has developed, tied to a panoply of forms of performance measurement and ‘surveillance’ and which is now strongly evident in the government's ‘best value’ framework for local government. This exemplar of ‘instrumental rationality’ provides an inadequate basis for realising the full potential role of evaluation in the process of ‘renewing’ local government. A ‘critical‐pluralist’ approach is proposed as a basis for enhancing the capacity of local government to address complex economic and social problems, to embed learning and improvement and to develop a meaningful ‘dialogue’ with its citizens.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Democracy and the RechtsstaatPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- Evaluation as Practical HermeneuticsEvaluation, 1997
- Public managementInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 1996
- Evaluation, learning and the effectiveness of public servicesInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 1996
- Ethical Issues in Policy EvaluationPolicy & Politics, 1996
- POLICY EVALUATION: INCORPORATING USERS’VIEWSPublic Administration, 1995
- Accentuating the apostrophe: The citizen's charterPolicy Studies, 1994
- THE NEW ‘EVALUATI STATE’Public Administration, 1991
- On assessing efficiency in the provision of local authority servicesLocal Government Studies, 1987
- Theories and Values of Local GovernmentPolitical Studies, 1970