COMPARISON OF THE LEICESTER MICROPALLIATOR AND THE CARDIFF PALLIATOR IN THE RELIEF OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 59 (4) , 503-509
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/59.4.503
Abstract
Two devices for providing patient-controlled, on-demand analgesia were compared for 24 h after abdominal surgery. The Leicester Micropalliator delivered a mandatory background infusion of 2 mg h-1 in addition to on demand bolus doses of morphine 2 mg i.v. while the Cardiff Palliator provided only bolus doses of morphine 2 mg i.v. The Leicester Micropalliator provided analgesia superior or equivalent to that of the Cardiff Palliator in patients who had undergone hysterectomy or cholecystectomy, respectively, and there was no increase in side effects. The total doses of morphine administered over 24 h did not differ significantly between the two devices.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- PAIN RELIEF AFTER ABDOMINAL SURGERY—A COMPARISON OF I.M. MORPHINE, SUBLINGUAL BUPRENORPHINE AND SELF-ADMINISTERED I.V. PETHIDINEBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1982
- Patient Controlled Analgesic Therapy in the Early Postoperative PeriodActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1979
- APPARATUS FOR PATIENT-CONTROLLED ADMINISTRATION OF INTRAVENOUS NARCOTICS DURING LABOURThe Lancet, 1976