Minimally invasive surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: The aim of the present paper was to systematically review the literature regarding the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy techniques in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Studies using unilateral or endoscopic exploration following imaging were compared with bilateral open neck exploration. Methods: Studies on minimally invasive parathyroid surgery were identified using MEDLINE (1984 to August 1998), EMBASE (1974 to August 1998) and Current Contents (1993 to week 34, 1998). The search terms were ((endoscop* or (minimal* and invasive) or unilateral) and parathyroid). The Cochrane Library was searched from 1966 to issue 3 1998, using the search terms ‘parathyroidectomy or parathyroid resection’. Human studies of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism using unilateral or endoscopic exploration were included. Animal studies describing minimally invasive technique development were also included. A surgeon and researcher independently assessed the retrieved articles for their inclusion in the review. Studies directly comparing the unilateral method with bilateral open neck exploration were used to analyse outcomes. Results: Analysis of data using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) indicated a tendency to favour the unilateral technique. These individual studies generally had large CI, however; therefore preference to the unilateral procedure cannot be espoused with certainty. There is also a selection bias due to the strict enrolment criteria for unilateral surgery. Conclusions: The proposed role of minimally invasive parathyroid surgery is for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who have unilateral parathyroid pathology. To assess the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive techniques it is suggested that their introduction be monitored as part of a trial in Australia, from which data should be accrued to a register.