Tests for 2×Kcontingency tables with clustered ordered categorical data
- 16 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (5) , 785-794
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.705
Abstract
Ordered categorical data summarized in a 2×K table usually consist of two‐sample multinomial or K‐sample binomial observations. In analysing these data, we usually assign scores to the K columns and perform a testing for the equality of two multinomial distributions in the former case and no trend among K binomial proportions in the latter case. Among the most popular score tests are the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Armitage's linear trend test. In this paper we extend the score tests to be used for clustered data under diverse study designs. Our methods do not require correct specification of the dependence structure within clusters. The proposed tests are based on the asymptotic normality for large number of clusters and are a generalization of the standard tests used for independent data. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the finite‐sample performance of the new methods. The proposed methods are applied to real‐life data. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjustment of Frequently Used Chi-square Procedures for the Effect of Site-to-Site Dependencies in the Analysis of Dental DataJournal of Dental Research, 1989
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Duration of effusion after antibiotic treatment for acute otitis mediaThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1982
- Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and FrequenciesPublished by JSTOR ,1955
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954
- THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINGENCY TABLES WITH GROUPINGS BASED ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERSBiometrika, 1948
- On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the OtherThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1947
- Individual Comparisons by Ranking MethodsBiometrics Bulletin, 1945