Validity and Reliability of Provided Constructs in Assessing Death Threat
- 1 February 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
- Vol. 10 (1) , 87-95
- https://doi.org/10.2190/5gwc-6cfw-7nfr-1w79
Abstract
A self-administered form of the Threat Index (TI) was introduced and compared to the original interview form along dimensions of validity, reliability, internal consistency, and independence from social desirability response set. The assumption that a split between self and death is indicative of threat was empirically tested by means of an expanded format. In addition, the death-relevant situations used to generate constructs in the interview form were tested for generalizability. Thirty-two introductory psychology students completed the study which required two administrations of the instruments, with a four week intervel between the sessions. Results supported the theoretical and psychometric soundness of both forms. Advantages, disadvantages, and appropriate applications of each form were discussed.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Death Threat Constructions in the Student and the PrudentOMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 1977
- Personal Constructs, Threat and Attitudes toward DeathOMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 1975
- Who's afraid of death?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1973
- Attitudes toward Attitudes toward DeathPsychological Reports, 1967
- Anxiety and Two Cognitive Forms of Resistance to the Idea of DeathPsychological Reports, 1966
- A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960