Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 69 (822) , 522-531
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-822-522
Abstract
This study describes the cross-calibration of two Hologic bone densitometers, one using a fan-beam X-ray source (QDR4500/A) and the other a pencil-beam source (QDR1000/W). The QDR4500/A allows spine and hip measurements to be made at three principal speeds. Results from two spine phantoms and 154 patients showed no significant difference in the absolute values or precision between speeds. The middle speed (taking 1 min to scan an adult lumbar spine) was used for the comparison between the instruments. The two densitometers were compared using two spine phantoms and 182 patients. In vivo measurements were made of all lumbar spine, hip, forearm and whole body sites. Regression lines, constrained to pass through the origin, were calculated. Slopes for total bone mineral density (BMD) for each scan type ranged between 0.994 and 1.029, the best value being found for forearm (1.000). Scatter graphs of the individual points were generated and showed results slightly worse than would be expected from repeat measurements on a single machine (79–88% fell within the expected 2 SD range). A trend for the QDR4500/A to overestimate BMD at low values and underestimate it at high values was seen in the femoral neck. The trend was more significant in the lumbar spine. There was an overestimate of total hip BMD throughout the range. Slopes of the regression lines for area and bone mineral content (BMC) were used to improve cross-calibration between the systems on a site-to-site basis, after which the results improved to a level consistent with repeat measurements on a single machine (81–94% within 2 SD). At present only global, rather than site-specific, correction factors can be employed for the spine and hip and no overall improvement in cross-calibration was possible. We conclude that although global correction factors allow adequate cross-calibration to be achieved, improvements could be made by the use of scan-site-specific factors.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniquesOsteoporosis International, 1995
- Precision and accuracy of measurements of whole-body bone mineral: comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometersThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994
- Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration resultsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scansThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Spinal bone density measured with a 5 s scanThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: Upgrading from a hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000Calcified Tissue International, 1993
- The range of bone density in normal British womenThe British Journal of Radiology, 1990
- Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometersJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1989
- X-ray dual-photon absorptiometry: a new method for the measurement of bone densityThe British Journal of Radiology, 1989
- Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Dual Photon Absorptiometry for Bone Mineral Measurements of the Lumbar SpineMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1988