FDG-PET/CT Tumor Segmentation-Derived Indices of Metabolic Activity to Assess Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Progression-Free Survival in Esophageal Cancer
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 30 (4) , 377-388
- https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0b013e31803993f8
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic abilities of PET tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity for the assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer were retrospectively evaluated. The patients underwent PET-CT imaging before and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Images were evaluated visually and quantitatively with a three-dimensional threshold-based region-growing program, which calculates SUVm, SUVa of the entire tumor, metabolic tumor length (Lm) and volume (Vm) before and after therapy (SUVm1, SUVm2, SUVa1, SUVa2, Lm1, Lm2, Vm1, and Vm2, respectively). Percentage changes in these metabolic variables before and after therapy were also calculated (%SUVm, %SUVa, %Lm, %Vm, respectively). SUVm1 (P = 0.018), SUVa1 (P = 0.019), Lm1 (P = 0.016), and Vm1 (P = 0.016) correlated with T-status. Advanced stage tumors (T3 + T4) had significantly higher glucose metabolism, metabolic length, and volume. Moreover, Lm1 >47.4 mm and Vm1 >29 cm3 were the best predictors of the level of tumor invasiveness. SUVm1 >12.7 and SUVa1 >5.9 could differentiate patients with positive lymph nodes from those without at presentation. %SUVa >32.3% and the SUVa1 >5.5 proved to be reliable predictors of pathologic response. SUVa2 >3.55 and SUVm2 >4.35 were the best predictors of disease progression during follow-up, with the latter having the best prognostic value. This study showed that FDG-PET tumor segmentation-derived indices of metabolic activity play a definite role in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and progression-free survival in patients with esophageal cancer.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2006CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2006
- Three-Field Lymphadenectomy for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction in 174 R0 Resections: Impact on Staging, Disease-Free Survival, and OutcomeAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Subtotal esophagectomy with extended 2-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal cancerEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Three-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Squamous Cell and Adenocarcinoma of the EsophagusAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Only pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves significantly the long term survival of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinomaCancer, 2001
- Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiation Versus Surgery Alone in Patients With Locoregional Esophageal CarcinomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- A Comparison of Multimodal Therapy and Surgery for Esophageal AdenocarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- An audit of the treatment of cancer of the oesophagus.Gut, 1994
- A randomized study of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery versus surgery for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagusCancer, 1994