Dosage effects of chromosomes of homoeologous groups 1 and 6 upon bread-making quality in hexaploid wheat
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
- Vol. 80 (2) , 281-287
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00224399
Abstract
The endosperm storage proteins, glutenin and gliadin, are major determinants of bread-making quality in hexaploid wheat. Genes encoding them are located on chromosomes of homoeologous groups 1 and 6. Aneuploid lines of these groups in spring wheat cultivar ‘Chinese Spring’ have been used to investigate the effect of varying the dosage of chromosomes and chromosome arms upon bread-making quality, where quality has been assessed using the SDS-sedimentation test. Differences between the group 1 chromosomes for quality were greater than those between the group 6 chromosomes. The chromosomes were ranked within homoeologous groups for their effect on quality as follows (>=better quality): 1D>1B>1A and 6A>6B=6D. The relationship of chromosome dosage with quality was principally linear for four of the chromosomes, but not for 6B and 6D. Increases in the dosage of 1B, 6A and, especially, 1D, were associated with significant improvements in quality, whereas increases in the dosage of 1A were associated with reductions in quality. The effects of 1A and 1D were such that the best genotype for quality was nullisomic 1A-tetrasomic 1D. For group 1, effects of the long arm appeared in general to be more important than effects of the short arm. For group 6, effects were found associated with the long arms as well as with the short arms, a surprising result in view of the absence of genes encoding storage proteins on the long arms. Significant interactions were found between chromosomes and genetic backgrounds, and between individual chromosomes. Analysis of trials grown over two years demonstrated that, although additive environmental differences over years and genotype x years interaction were present, they were relatively small in magnitude compared with purely genetic differences.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of Alleles for Complex Gene Loci Glu-A1, Glu-B1, and Glu-D1, Which Code for High Molecular Weight Subunits of Glutenin in Japanese Hexaploid Wheat VarietiesJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999
- Dough and baking quality of wheat lines deficient in glutenin subunits controlled by the Glu-A1, Glu-B1 and Glu-D1 lociJournal of Cereal Science, 1988
- Identification of legumin-like proteins in wheatPlant Molecular Biology, 1988
- Allelic variation of glutenin subunits and gliadins and its effect on breadmaking quality in wheat: Analysis of F5 progeny from Chinese Spring × Chinese Spring (Hope 1A)Journal of Cereal Science, 1987
- Genetics of Wheat Storage Proteins and the Effect of Allelic Variation on Bread-Making QualityAnnual Review of Plant Physiology, 1987
- Relationship between High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits and Loaf Volume in Wheat as Measured by the Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Sedimentation Test 1Crop Science, 1987
- The relationship between HMW glutenin subunit composition and the bread‐making quality of British‐grown wheat varietiesJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1987
- The effect of homoeologous group 7 chromosomes upon adult plant resistance of wheat to yellow rust (Puccinia striiformis)Plant Pathology, 1985
- Wheat storage proteins: their genetics and their potential for manipulation by plant breedingPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1984
- The Effect of Chromosome 1D on Hexaploid Wheat Flour Quality1Crop Science, 1964