The Statistical Basis of Decisionmaking in Electoral Districting

1 February 1976

journal article
research article
Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space

Vol. 8 (1) , 43-58
https://doi.org/10.1068/a080043

Abstract

This paper is concerned with procedures for dividing electorates into constituencies or electoral districts. Two traditions for drawing boundaries are identified, the British procedure of using neutral decisionmakers (Boundary Commissioners), and the American procedure which allows politicians to draw boundaries and thus leads to gerrymandering. If a statistical approach which focuses on the very large number of alternative ways of dividing up an electorate is employed, these two types of decisionmaking can be seen in statistical and political perspective. The most surprising finding of this approach is that in terms of political effects American gerrymanderers and British Boundary Commissioners produce similar types of districting solutions.

Keywords

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:

Electoral Bias and the Distribution of Party Voters
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1974
IDEAL AND REALITY IN REAPPORTIONMENT
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1973
REDISTRICTING, POLITICAL OUTCOMES, AND GERRYMANDERING IN THE 1960s
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973
Computers & the Law & Politics of Redistricting
Polity, 1972
Decentralizing High School Administration in Detroit: An Evaluation of Alternative Strategies of Political Control
Economic Geography, 1972
On the Efficiency of Alternative Aggregations in Region-Building Problems
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1970
Simplified Bipartisan Computer Redistricting
Stanford Law Review, 1965
Party Legislative Representation as a Function of Election Results
Public Opinion Quarterly, 1957
The Redistribution of Seats
Public Administration, 1955
The Law of the Cubic Proportion in Election Results
British Journal of Sociology, 1950