Seated Versus Standing Cycling in Competitive Road Cyclists: Uphill Climbing and Maximal Oxygen Uptake
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 21 (2) , 149-154
- https://doi.org/10.1139/h96-013
Abstract
Seven competitive road cyclists (M +/- SE = 23.7 +/- 1.5 yr, 70.5 +/- 1.7 kg) participated to determine the effects of cycling body position on physiological responses during uphill cycling and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). There was no significant difference in VO2max between seated and standing positions on a cycle ergometer (66.4 +/- 1.6 vs. 66.4 +/- 1.7 ml . kg-1 . min-1). When the subjects rode their own bicycle on a treadmill, oxygen uptake and heart rate were significantly (p < 0.05) higher during standing when subjects bicycled at 20.0 km . h-1 (4% grade), but no difference was observed when riding at 12.3 km . h-1 (10% grade). Leg RPE was significantly (p < 0.05) lower for standing position up a 10% grade. The results suggest that the standing position is less economical during moderate hill climbing, but during steep hill climbing, it results in a decreased sensation of effort in the legs.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Cross-TrainingSports Medicine, 1994
- Effect of cadence on the economy of uphill cyclingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1992
- The effect of body position on the energy cost of cyclingMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1991
- Effects of standing cycling and the use of toe stirrups on maximal oxygen uptakeEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1987
- Measurement of pedal loading in bicycling: II. Analysis and resultsJournal of Biomechanics, 1981
- Forces applied to a bicycle during normal cyclingJournal of Biomechanics, 1979
- Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletesJournal of Applied Physiology, 1977