Spectinomycin interacts specifically with the residues G1064and C1192in 16S rRNA, thereby potentially freezing this molecule into an inactive conformation
Open Access
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nucleic Acids Research
- Vol. 22 (3) , 325-331
- https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.3.325
Abstract
The upper stem of helix 34, consisting of the basepaired sequences C1063G1064U1065 and A1191C1192G1193, is suggested to be involved in the binding of spectinomycin. In E.coli 16S rRNA, each of the three mutations at position C1192 confers resistance to spectinomycin. In chloroplast ribosomes from tobacco plants and algae, resistance is conferred by single mutations at positions 1064, 1191, and 1193 (E.coli numbering). Since each of these mutations disrupt any of the three basepairs in the upper stem of helix 34, it has been postulated that spectinomycin can bind to this region and inhibit protein synthesis, only if its nucleotides are basepaired. We have tested this hypothesis by introducing disruptive and compensatory mutations that alter the basepair G1064-C1192. Using the specialized ribosome system, the translational activity of such mutants was determined, in the absence and presence of spectinomycin. We show that any of the three disruptive mutations A1064, C1064, and U1064 confer resistance, in accordance with the model for spectinomycin binding. Compensatory mutations A1064U1192, C1064G1192, and U1064A1192 however, maintained the resistance. This indicates that a basepaired conformation as such is not sufficient for spectinomycin binding, but rather that a G-C pair at positions 1064 and 1192 is required. In addition, we find that the translational activity of specialized ribosomes containing the mutations C1064G1192 is 5-fold lower compared to that of ribosomes containing any of the other mutations introduced, regardless whether spectinomycin is present or not. Since the introduction of C1064G1192 is expected to increase the stability of the upper stem of helix 34, we suggest that these mutations impair ribosome function by preventing the (transient) disruption of the upper stem. By analogy, we speculate that spectinomycin blocks protein synthesis by stabilizing the upper stem. In both cases, the 30S subunit would be frozen into an inactive conformation.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- In vivo chemical footprinting of the Escherichia coli ribosomeBiochemistry, 1992
- The structure of ribosomal protein S5 reveals sites of interaction with 16S rRNANature, 1992
- Model for the three-dimensional folding of 16 S ribosomal RNAJournal of Molecular Biology, 1988
- A detailed model of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA in situ in the 30 S subunitJournal of Molecular Biology, 1988
- [46] Antibiotic resistance mutations in ribosomal RNA genes of Escherichia coliPublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Spectinomycin resistance at site 1192 in 16S ribosomal RNA of E. coli: an analysis of three mutantsBiochimie, 1987
- Antibiotic resistance mutations in 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes ofEscherichia coliNucleic Acids Research, 1984
- Covalent crosslinking of tRNA1Val to 16S RNA at the ribosomal P site: identification of crosslinked residues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1982
- Bacterial‐Protein SynthesisEuropean Journal of Biochemistry, 1973
- Ribosomal protein conferring sensitivity to the antibiotic spectinomycin in Escherichia coli.1968