Measuring Outcomes of Midwifery Care: Development of An Instrument To Assess Optimality
- 10 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Vol. 46 (5) , 274-281
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-9523(01)00158-1
Abstract
Research on the outcomes of midwifery care is hampered by the lack of appropriate instruments that measure both process and outcomes of care in lower risk women. This article describes an effort to adapt an existing measurement instrument focused on the optimal outcomes of care ( The Optimality Index—US ) to reflect the contemporary style of U.S.-based nurse-midwifery practice. Evidence for content validity of the instrument was derived from literature reports of randomized clinical trials, synthetic reviews, and the clinical consensus of professional reviewers. Eleven perinatal health professionals and consumers, representing disciplines of obstetrics and gynecology, midwifery, epidemiology, and neonatology reviewed the instrument. The instrument was then applied to an existing data set of women who intended to give birth at home ( N = 1,286 women) to determine its utility in measuring events in the process and outcome of perinatal health care as managed by nurse-midwives. Results suggest that the tool holds promise for use in outcomes studies of U.S. perinatal care. Further testing of the instrument among diverse multicultural population groups, with various providers, and in diverse birth settings is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis of the Safety of Home BirthBirth, 2008
- Outcomes of intended home births in nurse-midwifery practice: a prospective descriptive studyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based studyBMJ, 1998
- Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- An approach to measuring quality of midwifery careJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981–1987Midwifery, 1994
- The Analysis of Clinical Outcomes: Getting Started in BenchmarkingThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1994
- WHO appropriate technology for birth revisitedBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- A descriptive analysis of home births attended by CNMs in two nurse-midwifery servicesJournal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1991
- Prenatal and intrapartum high-risk screeningAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1973