Tumour versus patient: vascular and tumour survival versus prognosis
- 21 March 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Pathology
- Vol. 193 (4) , 425-426
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9896(200104)193:4<425::aid-path830>3.0.co;2-e
Abstract
The concept that malignant solid tumour growth depends on angiogenesis is widely recognized. For some tumour types, there is a measurable range of vascularity and the link between prognosis and increased vascular density, best observed at the hotspots at the edge, is now established. What is less discussed are the corollaries: that tumour invasion requires tissue destruction; that the neovasculature must be not only protected but also sustained, especially at the tumour edge; that for tumour survival the edge is the future and the centre is history; and that angiogenesis is essential not only for tumour growth but also for tumour invasion. Different patterns of vascular density in tumour edge and centre have been observed, and these are linked to lymphatic spread and prognosis. The variation is attributable to differing interactions between endothelium and the tumour cell that dictate vascular and tumour survival; this may become relevant to anti‐angiogenesis therapies. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Endothelial capillaries chemotactically attract tumour cellsThe Journal of Pathology, 2000
- ‘Invading edge vs. inner’ (edvin) patterns of vascularization: an interplay between angiogenic and vascular survival factors defines the clinical behaviour of non-small cell lung cancerThe Journal of Pathology, 2000
- The effect of extracellular pH on angiogenesis in vitroAngiogenesis, 1999
- Tumours acquire their vasculature by vessel incorporation, not vessel ingrowthThe Journal of Pathology, 1987
- Tumor AngiogenesisPublished by Elsevier ,1985
- Endothelial-cell proliferation in experimental tumoursBritish Journal of Cancer, 1982