Election Cycles and War
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 35 (2) , 212-244
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035002004
Abstract
Insight into the effect of domestic factors on the international conflict behavior of democratic states can be garnered from treating electoral cycles as cycles in the relative power of state and society. This article shows that there is a discernible relationship between election cycles and the behavior of democratic states in international conflicts. In the past 200 years, democratic states have tended to get into relatively more wars early in the election cycle and fewer wars late in the cycle. Interestingly, this result holds regardless of whether it was a democracy or a nondemocracy which initiated the war. The author argues, however, that this pattern at the international level is insufficient for drawing firm conclusions about the preferences of democratic states and societies at the domestic level. Finally, the author suggests that although election dynamics may mitigate against war entry in the short run, it is plausible that they have made war more likely or more severe in the long run.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regime Types and International Conflict, 1816-1976Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1989
- Conflict Resolution and PeaceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Conflict datasets: Definitions and measurementInternational Interactions, 1988
- Domestic Politics and WarJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1988
- Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level gamesInternational Organization, 1988
- Mirror, Mirror on the Wall...Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Democracy and War InvolvementJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- Libertarianism and International ViolenceJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1983
- The dynamics of presidential support during international conflict situations: The Iranian hostage crisisPolitical Behavior, 1981
- Explaining Presidential Popularity: How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One's Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of AnomaliesAmerican Political Science Review, 1978