Adolescent Perceptions of Interparental Conflict, Stressors, and Coping as Predictors of Adolescent Family Life Satisfaction
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sociological Inquiry
- Vol. 69 (4) , 599-620
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1999.tb00888.x
Abstract
Using family stress theory, this study examined the relationship between adolescent reports of selected demographic variables (gender, age, family form), interparental conflict (style, content, intensity, resolution), stress due to the pileup of stressors, coping strategies (social support, detrimental coping), and adolescent family life satisfaction. The sample was comprised of 155 adolescents ranging from 14 to 18 years of age who completed self‐report questionnaires at one of three rural Oklahoma high schools. Four dimensions of interparental conflict (overt conflict style, conflict about childrearing, conflict about family roles/finances, conflict resolution), stress due to pileup, social support coping, and detrimental coping were significantly related to family life satisfaction. Adolescent age was positively related to family life satisfaction.Within the scope of family stress theory, scholars have addressed how the combination of stressors and coping strategies relates to the adaptation of individuals within family systems (McCubbin and Patterson 1983). Further, investigations of the relationship of parental divorce to well‐being in children and adolescents suggest that interaction patterns within various family forms may be more fruitful in explaining the adaptation of youth than parental marital status (Demo 1992). The perception by youth of conflict between their parents (i.e., interparental conflict) has emerged as a key family stressor that has the potential to explain variation in adolescent adaptation in a variety of family forms (Buehler, Krishnakumar, Anthony, Tittsworth, and Stone 1994).Stressor events for adolescents such as interparental conflict generally do not occur in isolation. Rather, they exist within the context of other stressors such as economic stress, difficulties at school, or normative developmental tasks for families with adolescents (e.g., changing family roles to allow greater adolescent autonomy; McCubbin and Patterson 1986). Further, considerable variation exists in the coping strategies (e.g., social support, avoidance) that adolescents use in response to stress (McCubbin and Patterson 1986). Finally, previous research shows variation between certain demographic variables and adolescent adaptation. Thus, the current study was developed to examine how selected demographic variables (gender, age, family form), adolescent perceptions of interparental conflict (style, content, intensity, degree of resolution), stress based on the pileup of stressor events, and coping strategies relate to adolescent satisfaction with family life (one indicator of adaptation).Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Double ABCX Model and Children's Post-Divorce AdaptationJournal of Divorce & Remarriage, 1997
- Family Resources and Adolescent Family Life Satisfaction in Remarried Family HouseholdsJournal of Family Issues, 1995
- Marital conflict and children's functioningSocial Development, 1994
- Children's Appraisals of Marital Conflict: Initial Investigations of the Cognitive-Contextual FrameworkChild Development, 1993
- Adolescent stress and coping: A longitudinal studyResearch in Nursing & Health, 1992
- Assessing Marital Conflict from the Child's Perspective: The Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict ScaleChild Development, 1992
- RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE ADOLESCENT FAMILY LIFE SATISFACTION INDEXPsychological Reports, 1992
- Personal Construction of Family Relationships: The Relation of Commonality and Sociality to Family Satisfaction for Parents and AdolescentsInternational Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 1989
- Vulnerability and Resilience in Adolescence: Views from the FamilyThe Journal of Early Adolescence, 1985
- STRESS, COPING AND DEVELOPMENT: SOME ISSUES AND SOME QUESTIONS*Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1981