A Theory of the Consumption Function, With and Without Liquidity Constraints
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 15 (3) , 23-45
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.3.23
Abstract
This paper argues that the modern stochastic consumption model, in which impatient consumers face uninsurable labor income risk, matches Milton Friedman's (1957) original description of the Permanent Income Hypothesis much better than the perfect foresight or certainty equivalent models did. The model can explain the high marginal propensity to consume, the high discount rate on future income, and the important role for precautionary behavior that were all part of Friedman's original framework. The paper also explains the relationship of these questions to the Euler equation literature, and argues that the effects of precautionary saving and liquidity constraints are often virtually indistinguishable.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Saving and Growth with Habit FormationAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Requiem for the Representative Consumer? Aggregate Implications of Microeconomic Consumption BehaviorAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income HypothesisThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- On the Concavity of the Consumption FunctionEconometrica, 1996
- How does Future Income Affect Current Consumption?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- The Buffer-Stock Theory of Saving: Some Macroeconomic EvidenceBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992
- Saving and Liquidity ConstraintsEconometrica, 1991
- The response of consumption to incomeEuropean Economic Review, 1991
- Why is Consumption So Smooth?The Review of Economic Studies, 1989
- Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Political Economy, 1978