Quantitation of cytomegalovirus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction as a predictor of disease in solid organ transplantation
- 26 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 73 (2) , 223-229
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20079
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity in solid organ recipients. Early markers to identify the progress of the infection and patients at high risk are required in order to apply a strategy of pre‐emptive therapy. The efficacy of pre‐emptive therapy relies on accurate laboratory tests to monitor CMV infection. The evaluation of CMV DNA kinetics by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely used for the management of CMV infection but markers predicting the progression of the infection and standardization of the technique are essential for the clinical interpretation of PCR results. A commercially available PCR system, the COBAS AMPLICOR Monitor (Roche Diagnostics, Brachburg, NJ), was used for the quantitation of CMV DNA in weekly blood samples (n = 504) from 47 solid organ recipients in the first 6 months after transplantation. PCR results were evaluated according to the development of clinical disease in order to find a DNA threshold and time points predicting the progression of CMV infection. Week 4 from transplantation was the earliest time point to note a significant difference between those patients who eventually developed CMV disease (n = 30) and those who remained asymptomatically infected (n = 17). At week 4, viral loads were significantly higher in patients who developed CMV disease than in asymptomatic infections (median value: 4 log10/106 leukocytes vs. 2.8, P < 0.0001). At week 4, a DNA level ≥4 log10/106 leukocytes was associated with a 45.37 odds ratio for CMV disease. Any increase ≥1 log from the first DNA detection to week 4 correlated with the clinical progression of CMV infection (odds ratio 1.74). In those patients who were treated with anti‐CMV therapy, a >97% reduction of the baseline viral load was associated with a complete therapeutic success. In conclusion, CMV infection is a highly dynamic process and the quantitation of CMV DNA by PCR is a powerful marker to control successfully the infection, but a strict follow‐up of the recipient and standardized PCR tests are mandatory for the best management of the infection. J. Med. Virol. 73:223–229, 2004.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of LightCycler-Based PCR, COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor, and pp65 Antigenemia Assays for Quantitative Measurement of Cytomegalovirus Viral Load in Peripheral Blood Specimens from Patients after Solid Organ TransplantationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Measurement of Human Cytomegalovirus Loads by Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Monitoring Clinical Intervention in Transplant RecipientsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Quantitation of human cytomegalovirus in recipients of solid organ transplants by real-time quantitative PCR and pp65 antigenemiaJournal of Medical Virology, 2002
- Cytomegalovirus DNA concentration in plasma predicts development of cytomegalovirus disease in kidney transplant recipientsClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2002
- Definitions of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant RecipientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2002
- The clinical use of various blood compartments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in transplant recipients with CMV diseaseTransplantation, 2002
- Role of the Laboratory in Diagnosis and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid-Organ Transplant RecipientsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Recipients of Solid-Organ TransplantsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- COMPARISON BETWEEN ANTIGENEMIA AND A QUANTITATIVE-COMPETITIVE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION AFTER HEART TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 2001
- Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA Load Predicts Relapsing CMV Infection after Solid Organ TransplantationThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000