THE EVOLUTION OF STATIC ALLOMETRY IN SEXUALLY SELECTED TRAITS
Open Access
- 1 November 2003
- Vol. 57 (11) , 2450-2458
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01490.x
Abstract
Although it has been the subject of verbal theory since Darwin, the evolution of morphological trait allometries remains poorly understood, especially in the context of sexual selection. Here we present an allocation trade-off model that predicts the optimal pattern of allometry under different selective regimes. We derive a general solution that has a simple and intuitive interpretation and use it to investigate several examples of fitness functions. Verbal arguments have suggested cost or benefit scenarios under which sexual selection on signal or weapon traits may favor larger individuals with disproportionately larger traits (i.e., positive allometry). However, our results suggest that this is necessarily true only under a precisely specified set of conditions: positive allometry will evolve when the marginal fitness gains from an increase in relative trait size are greater for large individuals than for small ones. Thus, the optimal allometric pattern depends on the precise nature of net selection, and simple examples readily yield isometry, positive or negative allometry, or polymorphisms corresponding to sigmoidal scaling. The variety of allometric patterns predicted by our model is consistent with the diversity of patterns observed in empirical studies on the allometries of sexually selected traits. More generally, our findings highlight the difficulty of inferring complex underlying processes from simple emergent patterns.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTERACTIONS AMONG MECHANISMS OF SEXUAL SELECTION ON MALE BODY SIZE AND HEAD SHAPE IN A SEXUALLY DIMORPHIC FLYEvolution, 2003
- EVOLUTION OF THE STRUCTURE OF TAIL FEATHERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE THEORY OF SEXUAL SELECTIONEvolution, 2003
- MAJOR-HISTOCOMPATIBILITY-COMPLEX-ASSOCIATED VARIATION IN SECONDARY SEXUAL TRAITS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS): EVIDENCE FOR GOOD-GENES ADVERTISEMENTEvolution, 2001
- The Evolution of Body Size: What Keeps Organisms Small?The Quarterly Review of Biology, 2000
- Environmental control of the cell cycle in Drosophila: nutrition activates mitotic and endoreplicative cells by distinct mechanismsDevelopment, 1998
- Von Bertalanffy's Growth Equation Should Not Be Used to Model Age and Size at MaturityThe American Naturalist, 1997
- Sexual SelectionPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1994
- Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birdsBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1988
- The Functions of AntlersBehaviour, 1982
- Genetical Aspects of Metrical Growth and Form in AnimalsThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1966