Nature and origin of seismic reflection fabric, Ruby‐East Humboldt Metamorphic Core Complex, Nevada
- 1 April 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Tectonics
- Vol. 8 (2) , 391-415
- https://doi.org/10.1029/tc008i002p00391
Abstract
Seismic reflection profiling across exposed upper and middle crustal rocks of the Ruby‐East Humboldt metamorphic core complex delineates important characteristics of the crustal structure developed during Tertiary extensional deformation. The goals of this study were to trace a Tertiary extensional shear zone from mylonitic surface outcrops into a seismic section and to characterize the deeper crustal fabric associated with the polyphase deformational history of the complex. Reflections in the shallow surface correlate with a plastic to brittle shear zone that formed during the tectonic unroofing of the middle crustal rocks. Constructive interference from strong planar layering in the mylonitic shear zone is considered chiefly responsible for generating the reflections. East and southwest dipping reflectors in the seismic section appear to correlate with exposed, opposing dipping mylonitic foliation domains. The opposing dips of the mylonitic layering may reflect warping of the normal‐sense shear zone during tectonic exhumation coupled with an overall anastomosing character. Deeper in the section, a heterogeneous reflection character correlates with increases in velocity shown from wide‐angle measurements in this region and is interpreted as penetrative fabric originating from extensional flow facilitated by broad‐scale pure shear and localized simple shear. Lower crustal rocks apparently achieved granulite facies metamorphism during extension. A maximum of 6–8 km of mafic material could have been added to the crust during Cenozoic extension. The Moho reflection has such a high amplitude that it may be caused by partially molten rocks interleaved with peridotite. Reflections from the Moho show no significant upwarping of the base of the crust beneath the core complex. This suggests that the lower‐crustal configuration is at least as young as the period of extensional activity that lasted from approximately 40 to 20 Ma which was responsible for the exhumation of the metamorphic core complex.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lower crustal reflectivity patterns in wide‐angle seismic recordingsGeophysical Research Letters, 1988
- Mid-crustal Cretaceous roots of Cordilleran metamorphic core complexesGeology, 1988
- Nature of the lower crust and moho in eastern Nevada from “wide‐angle” reflection measurementsGeophysical Research Letters, 1987
- Crustal structure of eastern Nevada from COCORP deep seismic reflection dataGSA Bulletin, 1987
- Thermochronologic evidence of major tectonic denudation associated with detachment faulting, Northern Ruby Mountains ‐ East Humboldt Range, NevadaTectonics, 1986
- The Mesozoic‐Cenozoic tectonothermal evolution of the Ruby Mountains, East Humboldt Range, Nevada: A Cordilleran Metamorphic Core ComplexTectonics, 1986
- The Moho in the northern Basin and Range province, Nevada, along the COCORP 40°N seismic-reflection transectGSA Bulletin, 1986
- Low-angle extensional faulting, reactivated mylonites, and seismic reflection geometry of the Newark basin margin in eastern PennsylvaniaGeology, 1986
- Seismic evidence of mylonite reflectivity and deep structure in the Kettle dome metamorphic core complex, WashingtonGeology, 1985
- Tertiary structural development of selected valleys based on seismic data: Basin and Range province, northeastern NevadaPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1981