A Comparison of Sucralfate and Ranitidine for the Prevention of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
Open Access
- 19 March 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 338 (12) , 791-797
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199803193381203
Abstract
Critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation are at increased risk for gastrointestinal bleeding from stress ulcers. There are conflicting data on the effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists and the cytoprotective agent sucralfate on rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality. In a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we compared sucralfate with the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 1200 patients who required mechanical ventilation. Patients received either nasogastric sucralfate suspension (1 g every six hours) and an intravenous placebo or intravenous ranitidine (50 mg every eight hours) and a nasogastric placebo. The patients in the two groups had similar base-line characteristics. Clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 10 of 596 (1.7 percent) of the patients receiving ranitidine, as compared with 23 of 604 (3.8 percent) of those receiving sucralfate (relative risk, 0.44; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.92; P = 0.02). In the ranitidine group, 114 of 596 patients (19.1 percent) had ventilator-associated pneumonia, as compared with 98 of 604 (16.2 percent) in the sucralfate group (relative risk, 1.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.51; P = 0.19). There was no significant difference between the groups in mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) (23.5 percent in the ranitidine group and 22.8 percent in the sucralfate group) or the duration of the stay in the ICU (median, nine days in both groups). Among critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation, those receiving ranitidine had a significantly lower rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding than those treated with sucralfate. There were no significant differences in the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the duration of the stay in the ICU, or mortality.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The virtual absence of stress-ulceration related bleeding in ICU patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation without any prophylaxisIntensive Care Medicine, 1994
- Stress ulcer prophylaxis — quo vadis?Intensive Care Medicine, 1994
- Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Stress ulcer prophylaxisCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Frequency of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a pediatric intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1992
- A randomized clinical trial comparing ranitidine and antacids in critically ill patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1987
- Prophylactic Therapy for Stress Ulcer Bleeding: A ReappraisalAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Comparison of antacid and sucralfate in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who are critically IIIThe American Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Prospective evaluation of the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after admission to a medical intensive care unitThe American Journal of Medicine, 1984
- GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING FOLLOWING HEAD INJURYPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1977