Prognostic Importance of Myocardial Ischemia Detected by Ambulatory Monitoring Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction
Open Access
- 11 January 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 334 (2) , 65-71
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199601113340201
Abstract
After an acute myocardial infarction, it is important to determine the risk of a subsequent coronary event. We studied the prognostic value of myocardial ischemia detected by ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring in patients who had recently had an acute myocardial infarction.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of treatment strategy on predischarge exercise test in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II trialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Symptom-limited versus low level exercise testing before hospital discharge after myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1992
- Identification of a high risk subgroup of patients with silent ischaemia after myocardial infarction: a group for early therapeutic revascularisation?Heart, 1990
- Application of meta-analysis using an electronic spread sheet to exercise testing in patients after myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Comparison of clinical and treadmill variables for the prediction of outcome after myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- Risk stratification with low-level exercise testing 2 weeks after acute myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1981
- Exercise testing early after myocardial infarction: Predictive value for subsequent unstable angina and deathThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Prognostic value of a single exercise test 3 weeks after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1980
- The prognostic significance of serial exercise testing after myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1979
- Prognostic Value of Exercise Testing Soon after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979