Changing Acute Renal Failure Treatment from Intermittent Hemodialysis to Continuous Hemofiltration: Impact on Azotemic Control
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The International Journal of Artificial Organs
- Vol. 22 (3) , 145-150
- https://doi.org/10.1177/039139889902200306
Abstract
Background: Continuous renal replacement therapy is increasingly used in the management of acute renal failure in critically ill patients. The advantages of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) over intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), however, are not yet fully documented. In particular, it is unknown whether continuous veno-venuous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) provides better control of azotemia than IHD. Objectives: To study the effect on azotemic control of changing acute renal failure treatment from IHD to CVVHDF. Settings: Tertiary intensive care unit. Patients: Forty seven consecutive critically ill patients with multiorgan failure and acute renal failure treated with IHD and 47 similar patients treated with CVVHDF. Methods: Analysis of daily morning urea and creatinine concentrations over the period of renal replacement therapy in the ICU. Statistical comparison of data. Results: The two groups of patients were comparable for mean age (55 years for IHD vs. 60 years for CVVHDF; NS) and number of failing organs prior to therapy (mean of 4.2 for IHD vs. 3.7 for CVVHDF; NS). Severity of illness at admission as assessed by APACHE II score, however, was greater for patients receiving CVVHDF (29.4 vs 25.7; p<0.003). CVVHDF was associated with a significantly lower plasma urea (p< 0.0001) and serum creatinine (p<0.01) level at 24 hours of treatment despite similar levels at the start of therapy. Throughout the duration of therapy, mean urea levels (35.0 mmol/L for IHD vs 23.4 mmol/L for CVVHDF) and mean serum creatinine levels (513 micromoles/L for IHD and 263 micromoles/L for CVVHDF) showed significantly (p <0.0001) better control of uremia with CRRT. Conclusions: Changing the form of renal replacement therapy from intermittent hemodialysis to continuous hemofiltration is associated with improved control of azotemia. The superior adequacy of small solute clearance achieved during CVVHDF provides additional support for its preferential use in the management of acute renal failure in the ICU.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishing a dialysis therapy/patient outcome link in intensive care unit acute dialysis for patients with acute renal failureAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1996
- Nutrition in Acute Renal FailurePublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Treatment of Sepsis-Associated Severe Acute Renal Failure with Continuous Hemodiafiltration: Clinical Experience and Comparison with Conventional DialysisBlood Purification, 1995
- Urea removal during continuous hemodiafiltrationCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Continuous Renal Replacement Is the Preferred Treatment for All Acute Renal Failure Patients Receiving Intensive CareSeminars in Dialysis, 1993
- Characterization of intensive care unit patients using a model based on the presence or absence of organ dysfunctions and/or infection: The ODIN modelIntensive Care Medicine, 1993
- Adequacy of dialysis: A critical analysisKidney International, 1992
- Acute Renal Failure in Critical Illness Conventional Dialysis Versus Acute Continuous HemodiafiltrationAsaio Journal, 1992
- Determinants of Survival and Recovery in Acute Renal Failure Patients Dialyzed in Intensive-Care UnitsAmerican Journal of Nephrology, 1991
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985